What are the guidelines that dictate how statutes should be interpreted in courts?

The guidelines that dictate how statutes should be interpreted in courts are known as the Rules of Construction. These rules provide a framework for interpreting legislative texts to determine the legislature's intent. They help judges and courts in making consistent interpretations of the law, ensuring that the application of various statutes aligns with their intended purpose.

Rules of Construction cover principles such as looking at the plain meaning of the statute's words, considering the context of the statute within the broader legal framework, and examining legislative history where necessary. By following these rules, courts aim to apply the law fairly and accurately, avoiding arbitrary interpretations that could lead to inconsistencies in legal proceedings.

In contrast, the other options pertain to different aspects of law. For instance, Rules of Practice generally refer to procedural guidelines for conducting legal proceedings rather than interpreting statutes. Rules of Evidence dictate what evidence is admissible in court, focusing more on the evidential process rather than the interpretation of laws. Rules of Law cover fundamental legal principles or systems but do not specifically provide guidance on interpreting statutes.