What is the role of the plain-meaning rule in statutory interpretation?

The plain-meaning rule in statutory interpretation asserts that if the language of a statute is clear and unambiguous, the words should be given their ordinary meaning as understood in common usage. This principle emphasizes that the statute itself is the primary source for understanding its meaning, and it promotes consistency and predictability in the application of the law.

By affirming the clear and straightforward language of a statute as its meaning, the plain-meaning rule directs courts and legal practitioners to rely on the text of the law itself, thus minimizing the need for extensive legal analysis or interpretation that could vary based on individual beliefs about legislative intent. This approach helps maintain the integrity of the legislative process by ensuring that the words chosen by lawmakers are respected and upheld as the definitive guide to interpreting the law.

In contrast to this principle, other options focus on broader interpretative goals or contexts that do not align with the plain-meaning approach.