What term describes the questioning of a witness after they have undergone cross-examination?

The term that describes the questioning of a witness after they have undergone cross-examination is redirect examination. In this context, redirect examination follows cross-examination, which is where an attorney has the opportunity to clarify or address issues that arose during cross-examination. It allows the original party who called the witness to provide additional testimony that may counter or explain evidence or points made during the opposing attorney's questioning.

Redirect examination is critical because it helps reinforce the witness's testimony and can restore credibility if the witness's reliability or memory was challenged effectively during cross-examination. The process aims to clarify any misunderstandings or misinterpretations presented during cross-examination by providing a space for the original attorney to ask specific questions that may help the jury or judge understand the full context of the witness's statements.

The other choices refer to different stages or types of witness questioning: direct examination occurs first when the party calls their witness, cross-examination follows direct examination and involves questioning by the opposing party, while recross-examination is questioning that may occur after redirect examination to further address new issues prompted by the redirect.