What type of statements does 'dicta' include?

Dicta refers to comments or observations made by a judge in a legal opinion that are not essential to the resolution of the case at hand. These remarks typically provide additional context, insights, or discussions about the law or the implications of the case but do not form part of the legal ruling. While they may be persuasive or informative, they lack the binding authority that comes with the core holding of the case.

In legal discussions, dicta can serve to illustrate a judge's reasoning or suggest how the law might be applied in future cases but do not necessarily govern the outcome of other cases, making them nonbinding. This particular distinction between binding precedent established by the case's holding and nonbinding dicta is critical in understanding judicial opinions and their applicability in subsequent legal matters.