Which document might allow a higher court to review lower court evidence?

The correct choice is a writ of certiorari because this legal document is specifically used to request that a higher court review the decisions and evidence from a lower court. The purpose of this writ is to ensure that the higher court can assess whether the lower court made any errors in its rulings or in the interpretation of the law. By granting the writ of certiorari, the higher court can examine the record of the lower court proceedings, including the evidence presented, to determine if there are grounds for appeal.

In contrast, a writ of prohibition is used to prevent lower courts from exceeding their jurisdiction or to stop them from acting in a manner considered inappropriate or illegal. A writ of habeas corpus is a tool used to challenge the legality of a person's detention or imprisonment, focusing specifically on individual rights rather than procedural errors. A writ of execution, on the other hand, is a court order granting the enforcement of a judgment, typically related to the collection of monetary judgments and not concerned with reviewing court evidence or decisions.

Thus, the writ of certiorari is the appropriate document for allowing a higher court to review lower court evidence.