Which legal school of thought emphasizes that government should reflect universal moral principles?

The understanding of the Natural Law School is foundational to recognizing its emphasis on universal moral principles in the context of governance and law. This school of thought posits that there are inherent moral laws that are universally applicable and exist independently of human-made laws. Adherents of natural law argue that government should align its laws and policies with these moral truths, which they believe can be discerned through reason and nature.

In contrast, Legal Positivism focuses on the belief that law is a set of rules and norms created by societal agreement rather than derived from moral considerations. Critical Legal Studies challenges conventional legal doctrines but does not inherently advocate for the reflection of universal moral principles in law. Realism emphasizes the actual functioning and implications of law in practice rather than its philosophical underpinnings or the moral dimensions.

Understanding these distinctions clarifies why the Natural Law School is the correct choice; it distinctly advocates for a legal framework grounded in universal morality, setting it apart from the other schools of thought.